缅北强奸

鈥淐onservatives have become enamored of the idea that politics is ultimately not about plans and policies, it鈥檚 about 鈥榞ut feelings鈥 and 鈥榲alues鈥,鈥 says Professor Joseph Heath

This 缅北强奸 writer won the Shaughnessy Cohen Prize

Professor Joseph Heath's Enlightenment 2.0 aims to spark conversation about reason in public life

Mere weeks after winning the Writer鈥檚 Trust of Canada鈥檚 prestigious , Professor Joseph Heath of the and the has been shortlisted for the Donner Prize.

Heath鈥檚 book, (2014) attacks the irrationalism he finds entrenched in Canadian and American conservatism and takes a fresh look at how to build reason back into our social and political institutions.Three other books are in the running for the Donner including Faculty of Law Professor Michael J. Trebilcock's , published by Oxford University Press. 

[Editor's note: April 29, 2015.]

Relaxing in his office at University College amidst neatly overflowing bookshelves, Heath admits surprise at being shortlisted for the Donner Prize, which tends to award scholarly works of public policy. Enlightenment 2.0, Heath鈥檚 fourth book aimed at a general audience, is less intent on recommending policies than on sparking a conversation about reason in public life.

In some ways, this conversation continues one begun in The Rebel Sell (2004), which Heath co-wrote with alumnus Andrew Potter, now Ottawa Citizen editor-in-chief. While The Rebel Sell attacks the anti-institutional impulses latent in the counter-culture, it doesn鈥檛 answer leftist anti-rationalism with a positive account of reason.

Enlightenment 2.0,鈥 Heath explains, 鈥渇leshes out what we mean by reason and what a rational politics would look like.鈥 This time, however, the target is anti-rationalism on the political right, which he writes has become 鈥渦nhinged from reality.鈥

Heath begins Enlightenment 2.0 in a diagnostic mode, recalling television satirist Jon Stewart鈥檚 Rally to Restore Sanity, held on the National Mall in Washington D.C. in 2010. That rally, Heath writes, 鈥渨as the first time, perhaps since the French Revolution, that reason had become the object of large-scale political mobilization in the West.鈥 The problem, he says, is that 鈥渃onservatives have become enamored of the idea that politics is ultimately not about plans and policies, it鈥檚 about 鈥榞ut feelings鈥 and 鈥榲alues鈥.鈥 They frame political discourse in simplified, base terms to appeal to our unreflective intuitions and sidestep rational thought.

Heath argues that the left cannot compete on these terms: many progressive ideas are inherently too complex to justify on the basis of gut feelings alone. Restoring sanity to public discourse means restoring a place for reason.

How do we restore reason? Heath thinks we need to begin with a better grasp of what it is. The reigning enlightenment idea locates reason entirely in the heads of autonomous individuals, and the public discussion of reason today, 鈥渄ominated by psychologists and economists,鈥 reflects this view. On their account, Heath says, 鈥渋f you want people to behave more rationally, they just have to try harder and maybe be educated better.鈥 However, in Heath鈥檚 view, if we want to reboot the enlightenment project, we need a better notion of rationality, one that recognizes its linguistic, social and cultural dimension. No matter how well educated we become, we are stuck with a set of easily exploited limits and biases built into our cognition. For example, our beliefs tend to serve our base interests rather than reflect reality. The lesson is that we need to 鈥減ay much more attention to whether the social environments we create are going to enhance rationality.鈥

To level reason鈥檚 playing field is to create a kluge, one of the more memorable concepts from the book. For Heath, a simple box of vegetables delivered to your door can be a kluge, a trick to ensure that he acts rationally. Knowing he should eat well doesn鈥檛 yield good choices at the grocery store, so Heath exploits other tendencies.

鈥淚 have the kind of ethic where, goddamn it, if I bought it I鈥檓 going to eat it. So I order a vegetable box entirely as a pre-commitment strategy.鈥

Even his office is a kluge, as Heath notes: a quiet, distraction-free space designed to enable concentration and clear thinking.

Heath is ultimately pessimistic about the conservative and anti-rationalist climate gripping our politics, but he does believe that we can realize small, gradual changes to improve our lives. The key is to design our institutions and the human environment to empower our rational abilities rather than exploit our inherent weaknesses.

The Bulletin Brief logo

Subscribe to The Bulletin Brief